Despite more than 20 years of
declining lobster populations in southern New England and extensive studies of
the shell disease that is a major factor in their decline, scientists are still
struggling to provide definitive answers to help restore hope to those working
in the local lobster fishery.
A new study of lobsters along the
eastern Connecticut coast has found that the disease is linked to warming water
temperatures, while progress is slow in efforts to identify probiotics to
counteract the disease and to better understand why so many lobsters are blind.
“Epizootic shell disease first
appeared around 1996 and became quite prevalent around 1999, and it continues
to be prevalent,” said Maya Groner, who conducted the Connecticut study
as a
post-doctoral researcher at the Virginia Institute of Marine Science. “It’s
been a challenge to figure out what the pathogen associated with the disease
is. The best evidence suggests it may be a suite of bacteria that chews away at
the carapace, but that suite of bacteria changes over the course of the
disease.”
Diseased lobster (Jeff Shields/VIMS) |
Her study found that the increased
prevalence of the disease stems from warmer water temperatures that induce the
lobsters to molt their shells earlier than usual.
Using data on 200,000 lobsters
collected over 37-years in Waterford, Conn., as part of the biological
monitoring near the Millstone Nuclear Power Station, Groner found that about 80
percent of male lobsters have the disease during warm years, with females
contracting the disease at a slightly lower rate.
“Molting their shell resets their
health,” she said. “If they don’t molt, there’s no way they can recover. But
now that they’re molting earlier in the spring, the molt happens before they’re
even challenged with the disease.” And the earlier molt allows the disease to progress
longer than if the lobsters molted in summer, as they typically do.
Groner found that for every 1.8
degree increase in the average temperature of the bottom-water in May, lobsters
molted about 6 days earlier. In early-molting years, disease prevalence doubled
by September.
“It’s very consistent with trends
we’ve seen with other marine diseases,” Groner said. “Organisms at the southern
part of their range – like lobsters in Long Island Sound – are limited by
temperature. They’re at their thermal tolerance limit. So as temperatures
increase, they’re becoming stressed and less able to cope with diseases.”
University of Rhode Island fisheries
researcher Kathy Castro has been studying lobsters for more than two decades,
and she decided to look for a solution to help lobsters recover from the
disease even though the precise cause of the disease was still uncertain. She
is collaborating with URI colleagues who are studying probiotics on oysters.
“Why can’t we identify good bacteria
that normally occur on lobsters, take the bad bacteria off, and repopulate
their shells with good bacteria?” she wondered. “In essence, the idea works,
but we don’t know what’s the right bacteria, how do we treat the lobsters, how
often, and how to do it in a reasonable time frame.”
In a laboratory setting, Castro’s URI
colleagues David Nelson and David Rowley isolated probiotics from healthy
lobsters and tested them against what they believe may be the “bad bacteria.” The
strategy looked promising. Initial trials on adult lobsters were positive as
well. But it may not be practical.
“Our initial idea was that
lobstermen could treat the lobsters on their boat,” she said. “But it’s hard to
do; you have to do it in a lab. Maybe we still haven’t identified the right
probiotic. And are we even working with the right pathogens?”
While that work is continuing,
Castro is investigating why about half of the lobsters she has tested are
functionally blind.
“That’s a more concerning issue to
me than shell disease,” she said. “My question is, is it related to shell
disease. The lobster’s endocrine control system is located in their eye stalk,
so if a lobster is blind, is it molting incorrectly, and is that contributing
to the disease.”
Castro said a colleague in Virginia
thinks the cause of the blindness may be manganese, a neurotoxin that harms
optic nerves and is released from sediments under low oxygen conditions. But studies
are just now under way.
“In my mind, it has to be related to
shell disease. That’s my gut feeling,” she said.
One of the challenges to finding the
answers has been inadequate research funding, Castro said, so much of the
research is being done piecemeal.
“I really wish there was something fundamentally
easy that we could do to solve all these problems,” she said. “That would be my
greatest dream. But I know it takes time. And as much as we know about
lobsters, there’s a lot more we don’t know.”
This article first appeared on EcoRI.org on October 3, 2018.
No comments:
Post a Comment