A new study of the migratory behavior of a rare shorebird,
funded by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, suggests that the impact of a
growing number of turbines will not be benign.
The rufa
subspecies of the red knot, a bulky chestnut shorebird that breeds in Arctic
Canada and winters along a wide swath of coastal habitat from the Southeast to
the southern tip
of South America, is a federally-threatened bird whose
populations have declined precipitously in recent decades. During the spring
and fall, they migrate over the Atlantic, and some stop to refuel at select
sites along the Eastern Seaboard.
Red knot (stock) |
The birds’
migratory route offshore – as well as their altitude, timing and preferred
environmental conditions – was unknown until a group of researchers from the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and partners in Canada, New England and New
Jersey placed nanotags on 388 knots in the fall of 2016. When the birds flew
within detection range of one of 35 radio towers from Cape Cod to Virginia –
including four in Rhode Island – their location, altitude and direction was
recorded.
According to Pam Loring, the Rhode Island-based Fish
and Wildlife Service biologist who led the study, the results indicated that
red knots migrate south in fall in two distinct waves.
“Those that came through during early fall went
straight southeast over the open Atlantic Ocean and were likely heading nonstop
to South America,” she said. Most of those birds probably traveled far to the
east of any of the areas targeted for wind energy installations, so those early
migrants are unlikely to be affected by wind turbines in U.S. waters the
future.
“The second wave came through in November and went
more in a southwest direction,” Loring said. “Birds from Cape Cod cut across
the mid-Atlantic Bight and arrived in the mid-Atlantic coastal region from New
Jersey to Virginia.” Those birds intersected with a large area leased for wind
energy off New Jersey.
Most of the birds in the second wave were recorded
flying less than 200 meters high, placing them at an altitude in which they would
risk colliding with wind turbine blades. Loring said, however, that there were
“high uncertainties” in the data about the precise altitude at which the birds
were flying.
Still, in a report she wrote for the Bureau of
Ocean Energy Management, Loring noted that the study’s elevation results place
“the short-distance wintering population at higher level of exposure to
potential effects from offshore wind energy development.”
Among the other findings of the study, Loring said
that the birds typically departed for migration just prior to sunset when skies
were clear and they had a tailwind.
“Using the dates, winds and other conditions, we
can predict when their movements would occur,” she said. That means that one
option for future management of offshore wind farms is to curtail turbine
operations during the time periods when red knot migration is most likely to
occur. That strategy is frequently used in the West to protect migrating hawks
and eagles from collisions with land-based wind turbines.
A similar study Loring is co-leading with
University of Rhode Island ornithologist Peter Paton is examining the offshore
movement patterns of piping plovers and roseate terns, two birds on the federal
endangered species list that breed in coastal southern New England and probably
migrate offshore through areas designated for offshore wind development. A
report of the results of that study, which included tagging birds on Rhode
Island beaches, is due later this winter.
In addition, Paton is leading a study of the
movement of various species of birds and bats around the Block Island Wind
Farm, using a tracking antenna installed on one of the turbines.
“There are several thousand tags out there on a
wide variety of bird species being studied by other researchers,” Loring said. “So
we’ll be looking at data from whatever species happen to come through.”
No comments:
Post a Comment